Hello everyone,
Today is a blogpost addressing many comments to both prior posts. The first comment to be addressed in a comment by "Ian" regarding the loss of adaptability of logic.
The second addresses a comment about God made by allisonshattuck. This comment, while appreciated for its attempt at reconciling God and Logic, espouses a principle which I vehemently argue against: the existence of God.
I'm still trying to find a way to upload the text in an efficient manner.
Re: existence of God. How, then, do you explain the resurrection of Jesus?
ReplyDeleteHe didn't resurrect? The Bible is not corroborated by any other historical data, nor is it correct on many facts. Why believe that it is true?
ReplyDeleteYou keep bringing up the invisible unicorn and forgetting this question... what if the unicorn claimant has hoof marks all over them. Just because someone else isn't there to experience the proof doesn't mean the proof wasn't presented to the claimant. Also I know you hold to the idea that aliens probably exist which violates your first law and arguably your second depending on your exact alien view.
ReplyDeleteIt's really only the invisible thing you have trouble believing but if an invisibility cloak existed and I met you when you were wearing it, that does not mean you don't exist... it simply means I can't see you. In which case all blind people would have to assume nothing exists.
What do you think?
Oh man you will never guess what I came across just now while researching something unrelated to this blog!! Check this out:
ReplyDeletehttp://bible.org/seriespage/invisibility-god-genesis-3222-30-exodus-249-11-1-timothy-117